Partners & Staff
Charles Knapper LL.B (Hons) IEng IMarEng MIMarESTManaging Partner
Charles Knapper is the Managing Partner and is the firm’s litigation specialist. He has numerous private and commercial clients across a wide range of litigation matters. Charles also has an extensive and loyal client base in residential and commercial conveyancing as well as other contentious and non- contentious matters including landlord actions and wills and probate.
telephone: +44 (0)1752 309090
direct tel.: +44 (0)208 1233841
fax: +44 (0)1752 309092
Additional qualifications include being an incorporated engineer with the Council of Engineering Institute and he is a Member of the Institute of Marine Engineers Science and Technology. As a professional engineer Charles has a specialist insight into many commercial and industrial disputes and is able to undertake specialist litigation work including catastrophic steam plant failures, marine engine and gearbox failures as well as general mechanical and electrical engineering disputes including motor vehicle repair disputes.
Charles obtained his engineering qualification having served over 12 years in the Royal Navy with the majority of his time spent on Nuclear Submarines. Charles is experienced in all form of propulsion systems including steam, gas turbine, diesel and nuclear. Charles is also qualified in the field of electrical generation and distribution as well as control electrical systems.
Charles is also a Senior Caseworker under the asylum and immigration accreditation scheme and undertakes advocacy work in the Asylum and Immigration Tribunal.
Cases of note include
Phillips & Goddard -v- Francis  EWHC 3650 (Ch)
- Landlord and Tenant Lease Construction Management Charges Double Recovery Lessor not Professional Agent, Qualifying Works Landlord & Tenanct Act 1985 s20ZA(2) Fragmentation of Works Financial Limit by Reference to Contribution not Costs of Works no Triviality Threshold all Qualifying Works entered into Calculation.
Lancefield -v- Lancefield  BPIR 1108
- Insolvent Partnership - No winding-up petition presented - Whether jurisdiction to make winding-up order - Insolvent Partnerships Order 1994, Sch 3 - Insolvency Act 1986, s 221(7), (8)
Phillips & Goddard -v- Francis QBD 24/03/2010
- Landlord and Tenant Holiday Lettings - Houses - Service Charges - meaning of "Dwelling" in S.18 LANDLORD AND TENANT ACT 1985. A chalet the use of which was restricted to providing holiday accommodation was a dwelling for the purposes of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 s.18. King v Udlaw (LT L 29/5/2008) not followed.
Smith -v- Cawse and Crawford 15/07/1997 (unreported)
Costs - Indemnity provision in tenancy - Tenant on benefits - Financial hardship - Possession of an assured shorthold pursuant to s21 Housing Act 1988 - Church Commissioners for England -v- Ibrahim (1996) EGCS 25 followed - Party not to be deprived of a contractual rights to costs unless good reason to do so - Financial circumstances of the tenant not a reason to interfere with contractual right to costs
Sinclair-Steadman -v- Beak 2005 (unreported)
Costs - Landlord recovering legal costs from deposit - Contractual right to costs on indemnity basis - No order for costs at possession hearing - Landlord seeking to recover the costs of possession proceedings and costs of serving Statutory Demand under the Insolvency Act 1986 from tenancy deposit - Can a "no costs order" interfere with the landlord's contractual right to costs - Church Commissioners for England -v- Ibrahim (1996) EGCS 25 followed - Rent was in arrears therefore statutory demand was justified as were the possession proceedings - No good reason to interfere with contractual right - Landlord entitled to deduct costs from deposit - Landlord's costs found to be prefectly reasonable as hourly rate was within scale for Grade A Solicitor - Tenant's claim for the return of the deposit dismissed
Scottish & Newcastle plc -v- MacPherson 22nd September 2010 (unreported)
Undue influence - whether the wife being a joint licencee and company secretary created a commercial relationship for the purpose of a personal guarantee given by the wife - Royal Bank of Scotland -v- Etridge  UKHL 44 followed - wife had no proprietory interest in husband's company and was a mere cypher - neither the position of company secretary nor the holding of the premises licence created a commercial relationship so as to disturb the undue influence argument.
Charles Cross Centre Limited CHI/00HG/LIS/2011/0144 29th June 2012
S20B Landlord Tenant Act 1985 whether or not demands were served more than 18 months after expenditure incurred. Preliminary issue as to whether demands found to be invalid could reasonably escape the 18 month period. Valid demands found to have been served more than 18 months after expenditure was incurred. Invalid demands could not take advantage of s20B (2). Gilje v. Charlegrove Securities Limited (No. 2)  EWHC 1284 and London Borough of Brent v. Shulem B Association Limited  EWHC 1663 (Ch) both applied.